Okay, so I was going to write about Ireland this week and
give you all a bunch of pictures, but the slide show is gonna have to wait.
Oh, you'll live. lol So why no Ireland fun?
Because I have a bug up my butt, that's why. A dilemma,
if you will. Something I have noted for awhile now, but as I get older it is
becoming annoying enough I feel the need to swat that sucker and crush it
underfoot.
What is this pain in my ass, you might ask? Well, as it
happens, it’s about sex. More specifically women and sexuality in romance. And
the whole what makes a 'good girl' in romance novels. Or a ‘respectable’ woman.
Somehow this is never as issue with the guys, is it? Male MCs can be manwhores all
day long and twice on Sundays. There are even specific tropes about the ‘manslut’
or rake, etc.
So basically if a man can't keep it in his pants, he's still
hero material, but god forbid a woman opens her legs too easily or too often.
Not only can she not be a heroine, at least without a tiresome redemption story, she gets regulated to the
‘washed up’
‘hard’
or ‘jaded’ girl.
The bad girl, or sad girl, the one we are supposed to pity, but secretly
feel superior to.
Men are told to be proud of themselves if they have a lot of
lovers and women are taught to ashamed,
Now, no, all romance
authors aren’t guilty of this. But precious few break the mold. The catalyst
for this blog was my recent read of Law Man,
by Kristen Ashley. She's an amazing, successful author and a good one. But while I mostly really enjoyed the book, something kept nagging at
me,a background of annoyance even while I was loving the romance and the characters.
Then after I finished it, it hit me.
Why the hell is it that it kept having to
be stated that the female MC has had so few lovers, and that she doesn’t take a man to
bed easily.
Excuse me, why can’t women take a man to bed easily if we damn
well want? What’s to say once in awhile a woman just doesn’t want a straight-up
fuck? Or more than once in awhile even?
Maybe you got kids at home and you aren’t interested in
exploring the complications of a relationship, but you def could use some
stress relief. Maybe you are loving being single, and aren’t interested in
giving that up? Hell, maybe you just have a damn itch you want to scratch…or
several of them?
Why the hell does a woman need to edit the number of her
partners, but a man doesn’t?
Why is an explanation of her sexual history needed
in romance, but by and large, a man’s isn’t?
Why is a woman who has a lot of
experience viewed as having low self esteem, or self respect issues?
What, you
can’t respect the hell out of yourself and want to get laid as often as you
like?
Argh!! Particularly in this day and age, when health and
pregnancy safety is relatively easy to ensure, why is this still such an issue
in our heads and even our fantasies? Yes, some woman DO have issues with sex
and seek it just for the illusion of intimacy and acceptance. Of course.
Guess what,
so do some men.
But some woman also are healthy, vibrant and successful…and
just like to fuck a lot. What’s wrong with that? And who are we as readers, or
writers, to perpetuate such an ugly, damaging stereotype. Does that mean to look down on the
so-called good girls?
Here’s a wild thought….
Can we just not look down on anyone? Whether you have
had one lover in your life or upwards of fifty, whatever. Your sex life should
be only your own to judge.
Personally, as a writer, in most cases I don’t make a lot of either my H or
h’s sexual history. Some are more experienced. Some are less. I try not to
define my characters exclusively by either. But it is sure to be a trigger in my lastest
work, because the h in question is a succubus, who has rather unique
perspective on sex.
She doesn’t feel guilt for having had lots of sex and she doesn’t understand why
humans do. Getting a handle of her is a bit difficult for our human H, but believe
me, he learns a lot. (and I don’t mean in the bedroom, though that too, lol)
Admittedly, my character is half demon, doesn’t have to worry at all about STDs
and has very little reason to fear men overpowering her (as if). So in other
words, fantasy, like all romance really. But even in PNR you see these clichés
perpetuated and I for one, am damn sick of it.
'Kay, rant over now.
But feel free to let me know your thoughts on this topic and any irritating examples you have seen. Or great books that turn this steroetype on it's ear.
Ta-ta for now, and have fun. in the bedroom and out. ;)
I'm right there with you! I don't see why we need to be defined by our sexual past.
ReplyDeleteAnd an succubus, eh? Can't wait to read that one! Wait, is this the one with Scott? If so, whoo-hoo!
haha, yup, it IS! ;) He has a lot to deal with, poor man. ;)
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by, and your books are def a good example of how to do h's RIGHT!
I suss what you say, I like to think things are changing. They won't change without a few more rants and some people to push things.
ReplyDeleteSometimes I think they are and sometimes I'm not so sure. *sigh* But I am good at pushing things. ;)
DeleteYeah, you would think in this day and age this would not continue to be an issue. I hear you, break that mold, girlfriend! :)
ReplyDeletehehe, I do my best! ;) Thx, Colleen.
DeleteIt would be nice, wouldn't it? But the Puritans and Joy Killers won't let anyone have that much freedom. It threatens them too much.
ReplyDelete
DeleteAnd isn't that sad? smh Thanks, AGE.
*mic drop*
ReplyDeleteFTFY. :)
Great post Heather, and I'm right with you.
Thanks, Rachel. :)
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete